| The difference women make: The policy impact of women in Congress ML Swers University of Chicago Press, 2002 | 1023 | 2002 |
| Are women more likely to vote for women's issue bills than their male colleagues? ML Swers Legislative Studies Quarterly, 435-448, 1998 | 505 | 1998 |
| Connecting descriptive and substantive representation: An analysis of sex differences in cosponsorship activity ML Swers Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (3), 407-433, 2005 | 204 | 2005 |
| Women in the club: Gender and policy making in the Senate ML Swers University of chicago Press, 2013 | 168 | 2013 |
| Women in the club: Gender and policy making in the Senate ML Swers University of chicago Press, 2013 | 168 | 2013 |
| Understanding the policy impact of electing women: Evidence from research on congress and state legislatures M Swers PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (2), 217-220, 2001 | 156 | 2001 |
| Women and politics: Paths to power and political influence MM Deckman, ML Swers Rowman & Littlefield, 2019 | 155 | 2019 |
| Research on Women in Legislatures: What Have We Learned Where Are We Going? M Swers Women & Politics 23 (1-2), 167-185, 2001 | 79 | 2001 |
| Building a reputation on national security: The impact of stereotypes related to gender and military experience M Swers Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (4), 559-595, 2007 | 75 | 2007 |
| Women in Congress: Do They Act as Advocates for Women’s Issues? ML Swers, C Larson Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future 2, 2005 | 75 | 2005 |
| An endogenous approach to women's interests: When interests are interesting in and of themselves B Reingold, M Swers Politics & Gender 7 (3), 429, 2011 | 60 | 2011 |
| Which women can run? Gender, partisanship, and candidate donor networks DM Thomsen, ML Swers Political Research Quarterly 70 (2), 449-463, 2017 | 50 | 2017 |
| Transforming the agenda: Analyzing gender differences in women’s issue bill sponsorship ML Swers Women transforming congress, 260-83, 2002 | 50 | 2002 |
| Why aren't there more republican women in Congress? Gender, Partisanship, and Fundraising Support in the 2010 and 2012 Elections KE Kitchens, ML Swers Politics & Gender 12 (4), 648-676, 2016 | 43 | 2016 |
| Pursuing women’s interests in partisan times: Explaining gender differences in legislative activity on health, education, and women’s health issues ML Swers Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 37 (3), 249-273, 2016 | 29 | 2016 |
| Descriptive Representation: Understanding the Impact of Identity on Substantive Representation of Group Interests ML Swers, SM Rouse The oxford handbook of the American congress, 2011 | 23 | 2011 |
| Political Science in a Different Voice: Women Faculty Perspectives on the Status of Women in Political Science Departments in the South L Van Assendelft, W Gunther-Canada, J Dolan, B Palmer, M Swers PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (2), 311-315, 2003 | 12 | 2003 |
| Political Science in a Different Voice: Women Faculty Perspectives on the Status of Women in Political Science Departments in the South L Van Assendelft, W Gunther-Canada, J Dolan, B Palmer, M Swers PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (2), 311-315, 2003 | 12 | 2003 |
| Transforming the political agenda? Gender differences in bill sponsorship on women’s issues M Swers, A Caiazza IWPR Publication# I906, 2000 | 12 | 2000 |
| Unpacking Women’s Issues: Gender and Policymaking on Health Care, Education, and Women’s Health in the US Senate ML Swers Representation: The Case of Women, 158-82, 2014 | 10 | 2014 |
Danielle ThomsenUniversity of California, IrvineVerified email at uci.edu
