Follow
Jeffrey Goldsworthy
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
The Sovereignty of Parliament: history and philosophy
J Goldsworthy
Oxford University Press, 2001
6112001
Constitutional interpretation
J Goldsworthy
358*2012
Originalism in constitutional interpretation
J Goldsworthy
Federal Law Review 25 (1), 1-50, 1997
2771997
Parliamentary sovereignty: contemporary debates
J Goldsworthy
Cambridge University Press, 2010
1762010
Interpreting the Constitution in its second century.
J Goldsworthy
Melbourne University Law Review 24 (3), 677-710, 2000
1372000
Interpreting constitutions: a comparative study
J Goldsworthy
OUP Oxford, 2006
1172006
The Reality and Indispensability of Legislative Intentions’(2014)
R Ekins, J Goldsworthy
Sydney Law Review 36, 39, 0
109*
Judicial Review, Legislative Override, and Democracy
J Goldsworthy
Wake Forest L. Rev. 38, 451, 2003
1042003
The self-destruction of legal positivism
JD Goldsworthy
Oxford J. Legal Stud. 10, 449, 1990
99*1990
Homogenizing constitutions
J Goldsworthy
Oxford J. Legal Stud. 23, 483, 2003
762003
Dworkin as an Originalist
J Goldsworthy
Const. Comment. 17, 49, 2000
67*2000
Legislative intentions, legislative supremacy, and legal positivism
J Goldsworthy
San Diego L. Rev. 42, 493, 2005
622005
The Limits of Judicial Fidelity to Law: The Coxford Lecture’(2011)
J Goldsworthy
Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24, 305, 0
47*
Research grant mania
J Goldsworthy
Australian Universities' Review, The 50 (2), 17-24, 2008
452008
Protecting human rights: instruments and institutions
T Campbell, JD Goldsworthy, ASA Stone
Oxford University Press, USA, 2003
452003
Constitutional implications and freedom of political speech: a reply to Stephen Donaghue.-Donaghue, Stephen. The clamour of silent constitutional principles; in Federal Law …
J Goldsworthy
Monash University Law Review 23 (2), 362-374, 1997
441997
Constitutional cultures, democracy, and unwritten principles
J Goldsworthy
U. Ill. L. Rev., 683, 2012
422012
Manner and form in the Australian States’(1987)
J Goldsworthy
Melbourne University Law Review 16, 403, 1980
42*1980
Moderate versus strong intentionalism: knapp and michaels revisited
J Goldsworthy
San Diego L. Rev. 42, 669, 2005
412005
Realism About the High Court
J Goldsworthy
Fed. L. Rev. 18, 27, 1989
411989
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20