Kirk Bansak
Kirk Bansak
Verified email at ucsd.edu
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, D Hangartner
Science 354 (6309), 217-222, 2016
4472016
Improving refugee integration through data-driven algorithmic assignment
K Bansak, J Ferwerda, J Hainmueller, A Dillon, D Hangartner, ...
Science 359 (6373), 325-329, 2018
1502018
The number of choice tasks and survey satisficing in conjoint experiments
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, DJ Hopkins, T Yamamoto
Political Analysis 26 (1), 112-119, 2018
782018
Beyond the breaking point? Survey satisficing in conjoint experiments
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, DJ Hopkins, T Yamamoto
Political Science Research and Methods 9 (1), 53-71, 2021
47*2021
Europeans support a proportional allocation of asylum seekers
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, D Hangartner
Nature Human Behaviour 1 (7), 1-6, 2017
452017
Using conjoint experiments to analyze elections: the essential role of the average marginal component effect (AMCE)
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, DJ Hopkins, T Yamamoto
Available at SSRN, 2020
14*2020
Conjoint survey experiments
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, DJ Hopkins, T Yamamoto, JN Druckman, ...
Advances in Experimental Political Science, 19, 2021
122021
Left-Right Ideology and the Debate over International Bailouts: The Case of Grexit
K Bansak, MM Bechtel, J Hainmueller, Y Margalit
The Journal of Politics 82 (2), 509-528, 2020
12*2020
Using eye-tracking to understand decision-making in conjoint experiments
L Jenke, K Bansak, J Hainmueller, D Hangartner
Political Analysis 29 (1), 75-101, 2021
102021
Why austerity? The mass politics of a contested policy
K Bansak, MM Bechtel, Y Margalit
American Political Science Review 115 (2), 486-505, 2021
72021
Enhancing compliance with an evolving treaty: a task for an improved BWC intersessional process
KC Bansak
Arms Control Today 41 (5), 13, 2011
72011
Estimating causal moderation effects with randomized treatments and non‐randomized moderators
K Bansak
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society …, 2021
5*2021
Combining Outcome-Based and Preference-Based Matching: The g-Constrained Priority Mechanism
A Acharya, K Bansak, J Hainmueller
arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07355, 2019
5*2019
Biodefense and transparency: The dual-use dilemma
KC Bansak
The Nonproliferation Review 18 (2), 349-368, 2011
52011
A generalized approach to power analysis for local average treatment effects
K Bansak
Statistical Science 35 (2), 254 - 271, 2020
32020
Can nonexperts really emulate statistical learning methods? A comment on “The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism”
K Bansak
Political Analysis 27 (3), 370-380, 2019
32019
Issues Develop as BWC Review Approaches
K Bansak
Arms Control Today 41 (1), 44, 2011
32011
Pruning the Nuclear Triad? The Pros and Cons of Submarines, Bombers, and Missiles
K Reif, T Sharp, K Bansak
The Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation 16, 2013
22013
Delegates catch early glimpses of BWC Review
K Bansak
Arms Control Today 40 (8), 47, 2010
22010
A Minimum-Risk Dynamic Assignment Mechanism Along with an Approximation, Heuristics, and Extension from Single to Batch Assignments
K Bansak
arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.03069, 2020
12020
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20