| Syntactic Surprisal From Neural Models Predicts, But Underestimates, Human Processing Difficulty From Syntactic Ambiguities S Arehalli, B Dillon, T Linzen arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.12187, 2022 | 52 | 2022 |
| Neural language models capture some, but not all, agreement attraction effects S Arehalli, T Linzen PsyArXiv, 2020 | 20 | 2020 |
| Surprisal does not explain syntactic disambiguation difficulty: evidence from a large-scale benchmark KJ Huang, S Arehalli, M Kugemoto, C Muxica, G Prasad, B Dillon, ... PsyArXiv, 2023 | 16 | 2023 |
| Large-scale benchmark yields no evidence that language model surprisal explains syntactic disambiguation difficulty KJ Huang, S Arehalli, M Kugemoto, C Muxica, G Prasad, B Dillon, ... Journal of Memory and Language 137, 104510, 2024 | 15 | 2024 |
| Experimental filler design influences error correction rates in a word restoration paradigm S Arehalli, E Wittenberg Linguistics Vanguard 7 (1), 20200052, 2021 | 9 | 2021 |
| Neural Networks Can Learn Patterns of Island-insensitivity in Norwegian A Kobzeva, S Arehalli, T Linzen, D Kush Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics 2023, 175-185, 2023 | 7 | 2023 |
| SPR mega-benchmark shows surprisal tracks construction-but not item-level difficulty KJ Huang, S Arehalli, M Kugemoto, C Muxica, G Prasad, B Dillon, ... 35th Annual Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Santa Cruz, California …, 2022 | 4 | 2022 |
| LSTMs Can Learn Basic Wh-and Relative Clause Dependencies in Norwegian A Kobzeva, S Arehalli, T Linzen, D Kush Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 44 (44), 2022 | 4 | 2022 |
| Neural networks as cognitive models of the processing of syntactic constraints S Arehalli, T Linzen Open Mind 8, 558-614, 2024 | 2 | 2024 |
| Syntactic Intervention cannot explain agreement attraction in English wh-questions S Arehalli, T Linzen, G Legendre PsyArXiv, 2022 | 1 | 2022 |
| Syntactic intervention cannot explain agreement attraction in English Wh-questions SA JHU, TL NYU, GL JHU | | |
